Posts Tagged b2b tech marketing
How to launch your technology product
Posted by Michael White in Marketing on September 12th, 2011
How much should you spend on Marketing?
Posted by Michael White in Marketing on March 21st, 2011
It’s a question you ask yourself when you run a business or first take over a marketing team – how much should we spend on marketing? There are a few ways you can get to the right answer.
First, though, it’s good to decide what the purpose of marketing is in your business. I think the primary purpose of marketing is to help you acquire customers. In B2C, marketing helps you do that directly; in B2B, marketing helps you acquire contacts that you subsequently convert to leads which your sales team then converts to customers. So, if you want to acquire more customers and grow your business in either B2B or B2C you’re going to have to increase your marketing efforts. Companies that don’t spend on marketing don’t grow.
But back to that first question – how much should you spend? You can develop an answer using a mixture of a ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approach.
“Top down” – using industry benchmarks for marketing spend
Using this approach, you look at benchmark figures for your industry as a guide. For example, MarketingSherpa produce an annual Technology Marketing Benchmark Survey for B2B marketers. In the 2008 survey, the average share of revenue spent on marketing by technology organisations of between 100 and 1000 employees was 7.9%. IDC also produce an annual Marketing Investment Planner and in 2007 reported the average share of revenue spent on marketing by 95 large technology firms was 3%, with software vendors spending 5.5%. There’s a good white paper on some other benchmarks published by Marketo http://www.marketo.com/library/selling-marketing-budgets-to-cfo.pdf. They mention a 2006 report by Blackfriars that found B2B companies planned to spend 4.3% of revenue on marketing compared to 6.8% for B2C firms. There’s also a good post at http://www.imageworksstudio.com/client-lounge/articles-tips/setting-a-marketing-advertising-budget.html which quotes the US Small Business Administration as defining the correct percentage to be between 2% and 10% of sales, noting that for B2C, retail and pharmaceuticals the spend can exceed 20% during peak brand-building years.
So with a little bit of homework you should find a benchmark for your particular industry sector that gives you a ballpark indication of what your peers are spending.
But of course just because most of your peers spend, say, 5% of revenue on marketing, that doesn’t mean you should simply aim to spend the same percentage in your business without some further justification. Spending 5% of revenue on golf umbrellas and t-shirts won’t necessarily deliver you an increase in customers.
“Bottom up” – using your understanding of your business and current capacity
Most of us are not starting from a blank sheet when planning our marketing spend – there has usually been some level of marketing going on in the past that we can use as base for future planning. The tricky bit is to connect your past marketing spend to the number of new customers you’ve acquired in previous years. Can you analyse previous spend to get an idea of which expenditure produced new sales and new customers? For example in a B2B company, can you do a rough calculation such as “last year we spent X thousand dollars to produce Y leads which in turn produced Z customers”? Do you have any data that indicates which marketing activities do or do not contribute to sales outcomes? Ideally, you would like to understand your “cost of customer acquisition” – how much you have to spend to acquire each customer – and the “customer lifetime value” – how much each customer is worth to you on average.
Using a bottom-up approach you try to project future spend based on current results produced with the existing budget.
Some additional factors to consider
So you can use a bottom approach to calculate the kind of budget you think is required to hit your customer acquisition targets this year; then you can cross-check this figure with the top-down industry benchmark figures.
However, there are some other factors to consider before setting a budget, including:
- Life-stage of your company – if you are an early stage company trying to grow aggressively then you need to be prepared to spend disproportionately on marketing. The Marketo paper gives the extreme example of Salesforce, which in their first year of revenue-generating operations spent $25.4m on sales and marketing with revenues of $5.4m.
- Profit margins – if company A has $100m in revenue and a 20% margin and company B has $100m in revenue but 2% margin, it makes sense that they may not both spend the same percentage of revenue on marketing. Try to compare your company to peers who have both equivalent revenues and equivalent margins.
- B2B versus B2C – spending in B2C marketing is different than in B2B. For example, consumer branding campaigns are potentially a big budget item in B2C but should not generally be a big element in a B2B marketing unit.
- Available market – are you selling into a new market with lots of customers to acquire, or is it a mature market that is dominated by large incumbents? If it’s a mature market, increased marketing spend won’t automatically lead to new customer acquisition.
So now you have a number, what next?
So now you’ve developed a ballpark figure, say 5% of revenue, what should you spend it on? Yes, I know, holding a massive party is the obvious answer but may not be the correct one. Your choice of what you spend money on should be refined quarter by quarter. If you find that $10,000 spent on online ads produces $100,000 worth of new business, then double that spend. If you find that $10,000 spent on attending tradeshows produces no new business, then cut down on your tradeshow attendance. I’ll come back to marketing budget allocation at some point in the future because it touches on a lot of areas, including marketing processes, conversion rates, analytics, marketing attribution and much more.
White Paper: Generating demand for high-tech B2B products
Posted by Michael White in Lead Generation, Marketing, Search Engine Marketing on October 26th, 2010
The way people buy high-tech, complex B2B products has changed dramatically in the past 5 years. More of the initial buying process happens online, and more of it is controlled by the customer, not your sales team or marketing unit. Buyers typically initiate their research online before launching a formal procurement process. This means that by the time your sales staff meet a potential buyer face-to-face the buyer will have already visited your website, downloaded your product information, looked at competing vendor sites, checked your analyst ratings and studied your blog. In this white paper we look at the characteristics of complex high tech B2B sales and marketing; we review how marketing has changed in the era of inbound digital marketing; and we outline how sales and marketing units at B2B technology firms should address the new environment.
Value Propositions – what you do, why it’s important, how you do it
Posted by Michael White in Inbound Marketing, Lead Generation, Marketing, Search Engine Marketing on July 26th, 2010
What are you good at? What can you do better than your competitors? Why should I buy something from you? Many companies think they know the answers to these questions but often they don’t or cannot communicate them clearly. Technology companies in particular often emphasise a list of unique product features without clearly tying these back to a business problem they solve for their customers. According to the Forrester Research paper “Six essential elements of an effective technology marketing pitch”, only 34% of business professionals indicate that their best IT providers are able to articulate the business value of their solutions.
Another common problem is lack of a single definition within a company – if you ask two different sales people you get two different answers as to what they do and why they’re the best. Is this a big problem? Well, yes if you want to sell anything.
From the outside, a lot of companies look the same to their potential customers. The more complex the product or service, the harder it is for buyers to understand how to differentiate between the available options. You have make it easy for buyers to quickly understand how you can help them and why you are better than your competitors. You do this by defining a clear and compelling Value Proposition.
Your Value Proposition describes what you do differently, and how this helps your customers achieve a business goal or overcome a business problem. To quote Jill Konrath, author of “Selling to big companies”:
“A value proposition is a clear statement of the tangible results a customer gets from using your products or services. It’s outcome focussed and stresses the business value of what you have to offer”
To develop your value proposition you first have to clarify what’s unique about what you offer. You must then connect this to a real need of your intended audience. Finally, you have to quantify the value you provide in concrete terms.
So, starting with the first part, can you define what is unique about what you can do, what makes you better than anyone else? Next, make sure this unique capability is useful to your intended customers – what value can you deliver to them because of this unique capability? Is it something they are going to care about? Will it make a big impact in their business? Don’t position your company or product on a unique feature that is irrelevant to most of your customers (this may seem to be stating the obvious, but it happens). One good way to assess the value you deliver is to ask your existing customers. Why did they choose you and why do they continue to work with you?
Finally, try to quantify the value you can deliver – put a number on it and make it tangible. Can you provide concrete examples from recent case studies? Does your unique capability help customers to increase revenue, reduce costs, shorten time-to-market, increase profit? By how much? Can you be specific? Do you have evidence you can show to a prospect? As Mike Schultz notes in his white paper ‘Making lead generation work for professional services’,
“the value a client eventually realizes from your firm’s services might well be your “efficient and effective solutions that helped them grow their revenue and strengthen their business.” However, before they work with you, most buyers don’t have the first idea of what that means, or how it applies to them.”
The Forrester paper makes much the same point:
“Marketers frequently make broad claims of improved efficiencies, faster time-to-market, lower cost-of-ownership, and other catch-all value metrics without reference to what’s really being measured and who in the user organization owns those metrics.”
There’s an interesting Harvard Business Review article on the importance of value propositions, ‘Customer Value Propositions in Business Markets’ (HBR March 2006). They describe how South Carolina based packaging supplier Sonoco requires that each of its product value propositions must be:
• Distinctive – it must be superior to those of the competition
• Measurable – all value propositions should be based on tangible points of difference that can be quantified in monetary terms
• Sustainable – the company must be able to execute this value proposition for a significant period of time
As you try to develop your value proposition you’ll see that it isn’t easy, but it gets better with each iteration. You are trying to create a statement that clarifies “what you want to be famous for” – what you want your prospects to remember about you, the “mental shorthand” you want them to associate with your company. The eventual goal is a simple statement that’s easy for anyone in your company to deliver each time – what you do, why it’s important, and how you do it.
So keep asking these dumb questions until you get to a satisfactory answer. What exactly are we trying to sell? Who is this for? Who will want to buy it? Why will they want to buy it? Why won’t they continue to use whatever they currently use? Why won’t they use a competing or alternative solution?
The future of sales and marketing?
Posted by Michael White in Content, Inbound Marketing, Lead Generation, Marketing, Search Engine Marketing on March 24th, 2010
Marketing will become more technical, sales teams won’t be on the road so much, and there’s going to be more overlap and, hopefully, alignment.
The web, online advertising and online marketing are having a big impact on how Business-to-business (B2B) companies sell. But in some ways this just reflects the fact that B2B buyers now buy things differently too. Ten years ago, buyers started their selection process by talking to vendor sales people, often at industry tradeshows. And there were fewer people involved in the buying decision on the customer’s side. Today buyers do much more initial research online, so they know much more about a vendor before that vendor becomes aware of them and before direct contact is made. Who initiates the research and who participates in the buying decision is more complex, with more people involved even for deals in the $5k to $50k range.
This means that to be successful, companies need to meet the research and information needs of prospective customers at as early a stage in the buying process as possible. They need to be easily found online by the various people who contribute to a customer buying decision, and when they are found they need to provide compelling information that addresses the specific questions of each type of buyer or influencer.
The change in B2B buyer behaviour also means sales teams are going to change. Sales staff are being involved at a much later stage of the customer’s evaluation of a product. The earlier stages will be managed either by marketing or by a reconstituted sales team. Many B2B marketing units are starting to do some of the work sales teams traditionally did, from lead generation and qualification through to providing pre-recorded online demos, technical briefings, business cases and ROI calculations. Marketers can now use online video, animated product tours, webinars and other interactive and dynamic content to provide a ‘virtual sales demonstration’. While you cannot fully recreate face-to-face meetings online, you can get pretty close through the use of web conferencing software, video and the telephone. This enables you to provide product demonstrations and presentations over the web that traditionally would have been provided ‘on site’ at a customer’s premises by sales and pre-sales staff.
Another change to the roles of sales and marketing is that companies are automating the acquisition of potential customer contact details through registrations on web-pages and blogs. They will spend more time trying to profile prospective customers that they attract online so that they don’t pursue people who are uninterested and so they can quickly pinpoint those prospects that have the greatest likelihood of purchasing within a defined time period. For example, today if someone registers to download a document from my website they have to supply me with their name and email address. From this download registration I can see if they have been on the website in the past, I can look up their IP address and their broad geographic location, and I could pull further information from networks such as LinkedIn and Facebook. These techniques enable companies to build a more detailed profile of their visitors which helps them determine whether they are more or less likely to buy their product now or in the future. For instance, if the same person has repeatedly visited your website in the past 5 weeks and downloaded every document or case study you have then this indicates some level of interest. If in addition you find that 4 of his colleagues have also visited your site and downloaded documents, you might want to consider having one of your sales guys give them a call. This kind of profiling can be automated, and can lead to more rapid generation of high quality sales leads that can then be passed more efficiently to sales teams to close and generate increased revenue.
So going back to the original question, I think Marketing departments will become more technically oriented, more process oriented and more fully automated. Their contribution to demand generation will be more visible and more easily measurable. I think Sales will share some of the online promotional tasks and lead qualification tasks with Marketing, and I think there’s going to be a significant drop in on-site sales visits. Miller Heimann will still be used to analyse and handle large corporate sales opportunities that have been fully qualified as real prospects, but this will be the tip of the sales and marketing spear that began with the initial acquisition of a contact or lead from online activities.
What do you think?